R-Edification

Grant Stone Grant Stone

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfungsfragen Prüfungsvorbereitungen, ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Fragen und Antworten, PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager

Warum versprechen wir, dass wir Ihnen Geld zurückgeben, wenn Sie die PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfung nicht bestehen? Denn zahlose Kunden, die unsere Prüfungssofteware benutzt haben, bestehen die PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Zertifizierungsprüfung, was uns die Konfidenz bringt. PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfung ist eine sehr wichtige Beweis der IT-Fähigkeit für die Angestellte im IT-Gewerbe. Aber die Prüfung ist auch schwierig. Die Arbeiter von ZertFragen haben die PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfungsunterlagen mit große Einsätze geforscht. Die Software ist das Geistesprodukt vieler IT-Spezialist.

Die PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Zertifizierungsprüfung ist heutztage in der konkurrenzfähigen IT-Branche immer beliebter geworden. Immer mehr Leute haben die PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfung abgelegt. Aber ihre Schwierigkeit nimmt doch nicht ab. Es ist schwer, die PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfung zu bestehen, weil sie sowieso eine autoritäre Prüfung ist, die Computerfachkenntnisse und die Fähigkeiten zur Informationstechnik prüft. Viele Leute haben viel Zeit und Energie auf die PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Zertifizierungsprüfung aufgewendet.

>> ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Fragenpool <<

PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Fragen und Antworten, PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager Prüfungsfragen

Wenn Sie nicht wissen, wie man die PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfung effizienter bestehen kann. Dann werde ich Ihnen einen Vorschlag geben, nämlich eine gute Ausbildungswebsite zu wählen. Dies kann bessere Resultate bei weniger Einsatz erzielen. Unsere ZertFragen Website strebt danach, den Kandidaten alle echten Schulungsunterlagen zur PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Zertifizierungsprüfung zur Verfügung zu stellen. Die Software-Version zur PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Zertifizierungsprüfung hat eine breite Abdeckung und kann Ihnen eine große Menge Zeit und Energie ersparen.

PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfungsplan:

Thema
Einzelheiten

Thema 1

Implementing incident management processes and managing information security incidents: This section of the exam measures skills of Information Security Analysts and covers the practical implementation of incident management strategies. It looks at ongoing incident tracking, communication during crises, and ensuring incidents are resolved in accordance with established protocols.

Thema 2

Preparing and executing the incident response plan for information security incidents: This section of the exam measures skills of Incident Response Managers and covers the preparation and activation of incident response plans. It focuses on readiness activities such as team training, resource allocation, and simulation exercises, along with actual response execution when incidents occur.

Thema 3

Information security incident management process based on ISO
IEC 27035: This section of the exam measures skills of Incident Response Managers and covers the standardized steps and processes outlined in ISO
IEC 27035. It emphasizes how organizations should structure their incident response lifecycle from detection to closure in a consistent and effective manner.

Thema 4

Designing and developing an organizational incident management process based on ISO
IEC 27035: This section of the exam measures skills of Information Security Analysts and covers how to tailor the ISO
IEC 27035 framework to the unique needs of an organization, including policy development, role definition, and establishing workflows for handling incidents.

Thema 5

Fundamental principles and concepts of information security incident management: This section of the exam measures skills of Information Security Analysts and covers the core ideas behind incident management, including understanding what constitutes a security incident, why timely responses matter, and how to identify the early signs of potential threats.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q55-Q60):

55. Frage
During the 'detect and report' phase of incident management at TechFlow, the incident response team began collecting detailed threat intelligence and conducting vulnerability assessments related to these login attempts.
Additionally, the incident response team classified a series of unusual login attempts as a potential security incident and distributed initial reports to the incident coordinator. Is this approach correct?

A. No, because collecting detailed information about threats and vulnerabilities should occur in later phases
B. No, because information security incidents cannot yet be classified as information security incidents in this phase
C. Yes, because classifying events as information security incidents is essential during this phase

Antwort: C

Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
The 'detect and report' phase, as defined in ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016 (Clause 6.2), includes the identification, classification, and initial reporting of information security events. If events meet certain thresholds-such as multiple failed login attempts from unknown IP addresses or matching threat indicators-they can and should be classified as potential incidents.
It is also appropriate to begin collecting supporting information during this phase. Gathering threat intelligence and performing basic vulnerability assessments help in confirming the scope and nature of the threat, allowing faster escalation and response.
Option B is incorrect because while deep forensic collection occurs later, preliminary data collection should begin during detection. Option C is incorrect as incident classification is explicitly allowed and encouraged in this phase.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016, Clause 6.2.2: "Events should be assessed and classified to determine whether they qualify as information security incidents." Clause 6.2.3: "All relevant details should be collected to support early classification and reporting." Correct answer: A

56. Frage
When does the information security incident management plan come into effect?

A. When a new security policy is drafted
B. After a security audit is completed
C. When a security vulnerability is reported

Antwort: C

Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
According to ISO/IEC 27035-1 and 27035-2, the incident management plan is activated upon the detection or reporting of a security event, particularly when a vulnerability, threat, or compromise has been identified. The plan ensures structured response and accountability from the very first signs of a potential incident.
Clause 6.4.2 in ISO/IEC 27035-2 explains that incident response activities-including logging, categorization, assessment, and escalation-should begin as soon as a security incident or vulnerability is reported. This proactive trigger allows early containment and mitigation.
Security audits and policy drafts (Options A and B) are part of preventive or governance mechanisms, not operational triggers for activating the plan.
Reference Extracts:
ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 6.4.2: "The incident management plan should be activated once a security incident or significant vulnerability is identified and reported." Clause 5.1: "Detection and reporting are the initial steps in triggering the formal incident management lifecycle." Correct answer: C

57. Frage
Scenario 7: Located in central London, Konzolo has become a standout innovator in the cryptocurrency field.
By introducing its unique cryptocurrency, Konzolo has contributed to the variety of digital currencies and prioritized enhancing the security and reliability of its offerings.
Konzolo aimed to enhance its systems but faced challenges in monitoring the security of its own and third- party systems. These issues became especially evident during an incident that caused several hours of server downtime This downtime was primarily caused by a third-party service provider that failed to uphold strong security measures, allowing unauthorized access.
In response to this critical situation, Konzolo strengthened its information security infrastructure. The company initiated a comprehensive vulnerability scan of its cryptographic wallet software, a cornerstone of its digital currency offerings The scan revealed a critical vulnerability due to the software using outdated encryption algorithms that are susceptible to decryption by modern methods that posed a significant risk of asset exposure Noah, the IT manager, played a central role in this discovery With careful attention to detail, he documented the vulnerability and communicated the findings to the incident response team and management.
Acknowledging the need for expertise in navigating the complexities of information security incident management. Konzolo welcomed Paulina to the team. After addressing the vulnerability and updating the cryptographic algorithms, they recognized the importance of conducting a thorough investigation to prevent future vulnerabilities. This marked the stage for Paulina s crucial involvement. She performed a detailed forensic analysis of the incident, employing automated and manual methods during the collection phase. Her analysis provided crucial insights into the security breach, enabling Konzolo to understand the depth of the vulnerability and the actions required to mitigate it.
Paulina also played a crucial role in the reporting phase, as her comprehensive approach extended beyond analysis. By defining clear and actionable steps for future prevention and response, she contributed significantly to developing a resilient information security incident management system based on ISO/IEC
27035-1 and 27035-2 guidelines. This strategic initiative marked a significant milestone in Konzolo's quest to strengthen its defenses against cyber threats Based on scenario 7, which phase of forensic analysis did Paulina fail to conduct correctly?

A. Collection
B. Reporting
C. Analysis

Antwort: A

Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
As detailed in scenario 7 and reinforced in the previous question, Paulina began her forensic work after the system was restored-missing the critical Collection phase as defined in ISO/IEC 27043 and referenced in ISO/IEC 27035-2.
Forensic collection involves gathering volatile and non-volatile data (e.g., logs, RAM dumps, file artifacts) at the earliest possible moment in the incident lifecycle to avoid data loss. By waiting until after recovery, she likely compromised the chain of custody and the completeness of her evidence.
The scenario notes that her analysis and reporting were thorough, providing valuable insights and mitigation strategies. Thus, the failure lies in the timing and execution of the Collection phase.
Reference:
* ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 6.4.2 and 7.2.3: "Collection activities should begin immediately upon identifying a potential incident and before recovery begins."
* ISO/IEC 27043:2015, Clause 8.2.1: "Forensic collection is critical to ensuring reliable analysis and admissible evidence." Correct answer: A
-
-

58. Frage
What is the primary focus of internal exercises in information security incident management?

A. Involving external organizations to assess collaboration
B. Testing inter-organizational communication
C. Evaluating the readiness of the incident response team

Antwort: C

Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
Internal exercises, such as simulations, tabletop exercises, and mock drills, are designed primarily to assess the readiness, coordination, and performance of the internal incident response team (IRT). According to ISO
/IEC 27035-2:2016, these exercises aim to validate that the IRT understands their roles, follows documented procedures, and can act effectively under pressure.
While external collaboration (Options A and B) may be tested during joint exercises or industry-wide scenarios, the focus of internal exercises is on internal capabilities. These exercises help identify gaps in training, procedures, communication, and escalation pathways.
Reference Extracts:
ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 7.3.3: "Exercises and simulations should be conducted to test the readiness of the incident response capability." NIST SP 800-84: "Regular exercises increase response efficiency and allow staff to develop incident handling confidence." Correct answer: C
-

59. Frage
Scenario 2: NoSpace, a forward-thinking e-commerce store based in London, is renowned for its diverse products and advanced technology. To enhance its information security, NoSpace implemented an ISMS according to ISO/IEC 27001 to better protect customer data and ensure business continuity. Additionally, the company adopted ISO/IEC 27035-1 and ISO/IEC 27035-2 guidelines. Mark, the incident manager at NoSpace, strategically led the entire implementation. He played a crucial role in aligning the company's ISMS with the requirements specified in ISO/IEC 27001, using ISO/IEC 27035-1 guidelines as the foundation.
During a routine internal audit, a minor anomaly was detected in the data traffic that could potentially indicate a security threat. Mark was immediately notified to assess the situation. Then, Mark and his team immediately escalated the incident to crisis management to handle the potential threat without further assessment. The decision was made to ensure a swift response.
After resolving the situation, Mark decided to update the incident management process. During the initial phase of incident management, Mark recognized the necessity of updating NoSpace's information security policies. This included revising policies related to risk management at the organizational level as well as for specific systems, services, or networks. The second phase of the updated incident management process included the assessment of the information associated with occurrences of information security events and the importance of classifying events and vulnerabilities as information security incidents. During this phase, he also introduced a "count down" process to expedite the evaluation and classification of occurrences, determining whether they should be recognized as information security incidents.
Mark developed a new incident management policy to enhance the organization's resilience and adaptability in handling information security incidents. Starting with a strategic review session with key stakeholders, the team prioritized critical focus areas over less impactful threats, choosing not to include all potential threats in the policy document. This decision was made to keep the policy streamlined and actionable, focusing on the most significant risks identified through a risk assessment. The policy was shaped by integrating feedback from various department heads to ensure it was realistic and enforceable. Training and awareness initiatives were tailored to focus only on critical response roles, optimizing resource allocation and focusing on essential capabilities.
Based on scenario 2, did Mark follow the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27035 series regarding the incident management phases in the updated incident management process?

A. No, the second phase of the incident management process should include the collection of information associated with the occurrences of information security events
B. No, the decision on whether to classify events as information security incidents should be assessed before initiating the incident management process
C. Yes, all phases of the incident management process were established according to the ISO/IEC 27035-1 guidelines

Antwort: A

Begründung:
-
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016 outlines a structured five-phase approach to information security incident management, which includes:
1. Prepare
2. Identify (or detect and report)
3. Assess and Decide
4. Respond
5. Lessons Learned
According to the standard, the "Assess and Decide" phase must include the collection, review, and analysis of information associated with the occurrence of a potential incident. This phase ensures that the organization bases its classification decisions on factual data and contextual analysis, allowing the organization to determine whether the event should be categorized as a formal security incident.
In the scenario, Mark does introduce an accelerated "count down" process to evaluate and classify incidents, which is a commendable improvement in efficiency. However, there is no mention of gathering or documenting the actual event data prior to classification. This oversight fails to fully align with the standard.
Option A is incorrect because not all phases were implemented as defined-specifically, phase 3 ("Assess and Decide") lacks an essential component: the collection of evidence/information from the anomaly or event.
Option C is also incorrect. According to ISO/IEC 27035, assessment and classification take place within the formal incident management process-not before it. The initiation of the process includes the evaluation of whether a security event becomes an incident.
Reference Extracts:
* ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016, Clause 6.2.2: "The assessment and decision process involves analyzing the information associated with reported events to decide whether they should be treated as incidents."
* ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 7.3: "This phase includes collecting information from available sources...
such as logs, reports, and alerts, to support classification and response decisions." Therefore, the correct answer is B: No, the second phase of the incident management process should include the collection of information associated with the occurrences of information security events.

60. Frage
......

Es ist nicht unmöglich, die PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfung leicht zu bestehen. Dieses Gefühl haben schon viele Benutzer der PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfungssoftware von unserer ZertFragen empfunden. Dieses Gefühl können Sie auch empfinden, solange Sie unsere kostenlose Demo probieren. Wir sind verantwortlich für jeder Kunde, der unsere Produkte wählt, und garantieren, dass unsere Kunden immer die neueste Version von PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Prüfungssoftware benutzen.

ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Fragen Beantworten: https://www.zertfragen.com/ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager_prufung.html

Grant Stone Grant Stone

Biography

Contact Personally

Quick Links

Resources

Support